Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesNew Access Targets Wider Audience


April 1994 / News & Views / New Access Targets Wider Audience
Selinda Chiquoine

Although Access 1.0 did an admirable job of allowing developers to write applications without having to delve into code, Microsoft's $99 introductory price tag attracted many end users who were overwhelmed by the program. Microsoft has added ease-of-use features to Access 2.0 for end users and developers alike while also improving its programming capabilities. Access 2.0 is what Microsoft wanted Access 1.0 to be: an easy-to-use, full-featured, relational database for Windows.

Although Wizards and Builders guide the creation of tables, forms, and queries, Access 2.0 is not a simple program. Yes, Access targets end users, but it also serves power users and developers. Based on my use of a preliminary version of Access 2.0, the new ease-of-use features will be welcomed- -and needed--by less-technical end users.

For the first-time database user, I still lean toward Lotus Approach for Windows: It's less intimidating, and its learning curve is not as steep as Access's. But Access 2.0's ToolTips, Wizards, and cue cards have narrowed the end-user gap significantly. And, with Access 2.0, Microsoft's adherence to the menu structure found in other Microsoft Office Windows applications is paying off. Users familiar with other Office products will be able to perform basic commands immediately.

Lotus and Borland both target a narrower segment of the database audience with their respective Windows databases than does Access: Approach targets end users who want to create applications without having to confront programming tools, and Paradox targets developers. However, Lotus plans on eventually adding its own programming language, LotusScript, to Approach. And Borland will add tools to make Paradox easier to use for end users, says Vince Casarez, product manager for Paradox . But if you want a Windows database today that offers both power and ease of use, the nod goes to Access 2.0.


Illustration: Access's ease-of-use features should appeal to end users and developers alike. For example, to create a table, you can either use a Table Wizard or write a SQL statement in a data-definition query. Microsoft has added FoxPro's efficient Rushmore technology to make set queries execute much faster than in Access 1.1.

Up to the News & Views section contentsGo to previous article: TI Charges into the Notebook CPU WarsGo to next article: Access 2.0 Highlights for ProgrammersSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network