Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesUpgrading to the Old Version


August 1994 / Letters / Upgrading to the Old Version

I just finished Terje Mathisen's review of Novell DOS 7 (``Novell's Newest DOS,'' June). While some of the problems he was having with OS/2 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 can be avoided by turning DPMI=OFF in his EMM386.EXE statement, I sympathize with him. It seems that Microsoft's DPMI [DOS Protected Mode Interface] implementation clashes with that of Novell.

A friend introduced me to DR DOS 6.0 years ago. After much tweaking, it worked flawlessly with any program I tried. Despite the excellent technical assistance I have had from Novell, Novell DOS 7 still crashes randomly, with a screen dump citing invalid commands. This happens with something as simple as CHKDSK.

But I have come up with the perfect solution. Until Novell fixes Novell DOS 7, I've reverted back to DR DOS 6.0. It's too badthis DOS really would have given Microsoft something to strive for in its upcoming 7.0 version.

Ed Berlot

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

That parallels my own thinking; I loved DR DOS 6 and hoped that Novell DOS 7 would be good enough and stable enough to use on any machine. No such luck! --Terje Mathisen

I am very unhappy with Terje Mathisen's review of Novell DOS 7. Instead of showing the two products side-by-side in the real world, he suggested how much more ``complicated'' ND7 is than MS-DOS 6.2. Why the real, substantive differences between MS-DOS 6.2 and ND7 were completely bypassed is beyond me.

I suppose if you're a Windows user and are used to that ``one size fits all'' mentality, then, yes, Novell's DOS is too much for you. You've probably got Chicago already charged to your Visa and got dizzy reading OS/2's box. Forget NextStep.

The hope is that ND7 will inspire a war among operating systems: Who can provide the best multitasking (MS-DOS 6.2 misses), who can link the PCs in a network (Hello, Microsoft? We're waiting!), and so on. The sad reality is, we're slipping into a Neanderthal void as the ease-of-use advocates pound the daylights out of the functionality advocates.

Carl H. Payne

Orem, UT


Up to the Letters section contentsGo to previous article: Something to Think AboutGo to next article: Executive Information Systems SearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network