Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesDual SuperSparcs


September 1994 / Reviews / Dual SuperSparcs

Sun tests show that a second SuperSparc processor improves performance by 20 percent to 40 percent for most existing Solaris 2.3 applications. Once available, programs tuned for multiple processors will do even better. Sun points out that you don't have to see a performance doubling to justify a second processor: If the percentage performance increase for your applications is more than the percentage price increase for the additional CPUs, you come out ahead. If you order your system with two processors on one CPU board, the additional cost for the second CPU is around $1500, or 12 percent, over the base model list cost. However, if you add it later, you'll pay a steep $4500, or 37 percent, of the base price for a second processor board.

Near the end of my review of the SparcStations, I received and installed in the SparcStation 20M a second 50-MHz processor bo ard. Installation was simple because the system recognized and automatically worked with the new processor. Although I had no benchmarks ready to test multiprocessing, I did test around the edges of its potential using BYTE's Unix benchmarks. These tests are not multithreaded, nor are they designed to benefit from multiple processors, yet the second CPU provided an overall performance gain of around 12 percent. That fits with SPARC's higher estimates for more complex applications.

The best performance gain with multiple CPUs comes when you're running more than one application. With two tests running simultaneously (with a script), performance didn't differ markedly from when running one test with one CPU. As long as you run Solaris 2.x (which as yet has half the applications base of Solaris 1.x), a dual-processor system can run a fairly heavy-duty application in concert with other tasks with virtually no performance degradation.


Illustration: Graph: BYTE Unix Benchmarks

Up to the Reviews section contentsGo to previous article: SparcStation OverhaulGo to next article: Power of CooperationSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network