Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesHow We Tested


Novemb er 1994 / BYTE Lab Product Report / How We Tested

PERFORMANCE

Our nine speed tests measure each printer's ability to print documents with dense or sparse text, graphics, and fonts in a range of styles and sizes. The dense-text test requires printing a 2-KB file of ASCII text with little white space. Performance in this test correlates to raw speed, because there are no fonts or graphics for the printer to interpret. A second test document consists of ASCII text blocks broken up by areas of white space. Designed to simulate the printing of invoices and forms, this test is geared primarily to evaluating how fast dot-matrix printers can advance paper.

The graphics tests use bit-mapped images to simulate documents with custom fonts or screen shots. These tests help us determine how efficiently each printer communicates with a computer. One test measures the printer's ability to draw com plex lines and filled areas. A second test concentrates on producing curves and gray scales.

We use the font test to measure the speed of the printer's processor. The test requires printers to create serif and sans serif fonts in regular and bold faces in 30 point sizes.

We generated a performance index for each printer by combining individual test scores with weightings that emphasized the tests that were most significant for an application category. For example, the results of the graphics tests counted for more of a color printer's overall speed score than did the results of the paper-handling test.

PRINT QUALITY

Our monochrome print-quality tests are PostScript-based tests that measure a printer's ability to produce a photographic image; print attractive, legible text in a wide range of sizes; and draw lines. For example, the line-squeeze test forces a printer to draw two lines successively closer together until the gap between them vanishes--indicating that the printer can no long er make the black-to-white-to-black transition. The monochrome suite also gauges more esoteric features, such as how accurately the printer positions paper and how well the printer displays reversed (i.e., white-on-black) text and graphics.

The color-quality tests, also written in PostScript, in part stress a color printer's ability to print a wide range of hues and to blend hues (see the text box ``Color Quality'').

Although we wrote the monochrome and color tests in PostScript, we were able to test printers that don't support PostScript by using a custom Windows-based interpreter application that talks to the printer driver without any overhead that may be associated with commercial PostScript interpreters.

OTHER FACTORS

For each printer, we evaluated how easy it was to set up and configure the machine, load paper, and replace consumables. For individual application categories, we used the presence or absence of important features to determine whether a printer was eligible. For exam ple, the CAD and DTP category considered only laser printers that can accommodate 11- by 17-inch paper.

CONFIGURATIONS

We disabled print servers, spoolers, and buffers during testing. We ran PC-based tests using Compaq Deskpro 66M (66-MHz) computers with DOS 6.0 and Windows 3.1. For Macintosh testing, we used Quadra 640AV computers with System 7.1.

This issue also includes printers from previous Lab Reports that are still on the market. We retested any non-PostScript versions of these printers so we could compare quality using our new interpreter.

Contributors

Alan Joch, Senior Editor/BYTE, coordinates the combined testing between the BYTE Lab and NSTL.

Jim Kane, Project Manager/NSTL, led the testing for this report. He has evaluated printers, systems, and peripherals for three years at NSTL.

Siva Kumar, Technical Analyst/NSTL, specializes in hardware and network-operating-system evaluations.

John McDonough, Technical Writer/NSTL, has covered the computer industr y for seven years.


Up to the BYTE Lab Product Report section contentsGo to previous article: The Best Printers For General BusinessGo to next article: Color QualitySearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network