Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesPolysilicon: The Path to Better Displays?


November 1994 / News & Views / Polysilicon: The Path to Better Displays?
Chris Chinnock

New fabrication techniques for creating screens based on the polysilicon technology that's used in high-resolution, diminutive camcorder viewing screens could result in higher-resolution LCDs than those now found on laptop computers. But researchers must overcome several obstacles before this technology is suitable for notebook displays.

Most LCD transistors are made with amorphous silicon. Although suitable for the colorful screens found in high-end portable computers, amorphous silicon can't deliver the high-pixel densities that polysilicon fabrication can achieve. Companies like Hitachi and Seiko-Epson have introduced new polysilicon products for the projection and head-mounted display markets. NEC, Sharp, Toshiba, and others have demons trated prototype polysilicon displays for the HDTV market. But until manufacturers perfect new processing techniques for large format polysilicon, the technology will be relegated to virtual reality and projection applications.

Although polysilicon technology has many benefits, it also has its challenges. The high-temperature fabrication process that is the most mature for creating polysilicon transistors requires the use of quartz substrates, because glass substrates would melt. In addition to being more expensive to produce than glass substrates, quartz substrates are limited to 6 to 8 inches in diameter, which also limits the size of the resulting display. Companies in Japan and the U.S. are investigating low-temperature processes, but researchers don't expect larger-format polysilicon displays until the next century.

Another obstacle to polysilicon is the demand for active-matrix displays, which is driving manufacturers to expand amorphous capacity, overpowering consideration of polysilicon. ``Virtual reality hasn't taken off yet, so there isn't a market for these [polysilicon] displays,'' says Joel Pollack, display product-marketing manager at Sharp Microelectronics (Camas, WA). ``The projector market is experiencing steady growth, but it is still minuscule compared to the notebook or small TV market.''

Tim Patton, business planning manager at Hitachi America's Electron Tube and Devices Division (Norcross, GA), acknowledges the risk in developing polysilicon technology: ``We know there is a need in the projection market, and there is an unknown, but potentially large, market in virtual reality and head-mounted displays. We want to learn how to make polysilicon displays and position ourselves for the development of a large-format polysilicon process.'' Until that happens, high-resolution polysilicon displays will be relegated to the small screen.


Illustration: Amorphous vs. Polysilicon Displays Polysilicon displays offer advantages in performance and assembly costs compared to amorphous silicon-based displays. Amorphous silicon quality is good enough to fabricate screen transistors that control the light, but it is not good enough to fabricate the drive circuits that regulate the amount of light that passes through each display pixel--the driver circuits must be fabricated separately and connected to the LCD glass using standard interconnect methods. Polysilicon quality is good enough to support the simultaneous fabrication of LCD transistors and drive circuits on the same substrate. Because driver ICs are now integral to the design, pixel density is not limited by interconnect technology, as it is with amorphous silicon. Thus, polysilicon delivers screens with much higher resolution than amorphous technology.

Up to the News & Views section contentsGo to previous article: Alaris's Pentium-Class NX586 VL
Go to next article: Silicon Technologies at a GlanceSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network