Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesDo Your Eyes A Favor: 17-Inch Monitors


January 1995 / BYTE Lab Product Report / Do Your Eyes A Favor: 17-Inch Monitors

If you spend more than four hours a day in front of a 15-inch monitor, consider moving up to a 17-inch monitor with better resolution. The higher resolution will increase your viewing real estate, and the larger screen will make the images larger, so you'll be able to see those additional spreadsheet cells. A high-refresh rate reduces flicker and will be easier on your eyes. We tested 44 17-inch monitors. Prices ranged from $659 to $1299.

About one-half of the 17-inch monitors have maximum noninterlaced resolutions of 1280 by 1024 pixels. Most of the others support higher noninterlaced resolutions (1600 by 1200 or 1600 by 1280 pixels). The exceptions are the NEC, Radius, and Panasonic units, which are limited to a maximum resolution of 1024 by 768 pixels. We believe that 1024- by 768-pixel resolution on a 17-inch monitor provides excellent viewing. As the resolution increases, text and objects get smaller, so you would need to be sharp-eyed to enjoy working at resolutions of 1280 by 1024 pixels or higher on this size screen.

All monitors except two are Energy Star recipients and all but eight provide internal power management systems. All meet Sweden's MPR-II standards for VDT emissions. Several carry FCC Class A ratings and are not recommended for home use; they may cause interference with TV reception.

Controls range from basic contrast and brightness to more sophisticated features such as degauss and side convergence, or pincushioning. On most, you can adjust the color to some extent. Sixteen of the monitors provide on-screen menus for image adjustments. All but four monitors support at least one Macintosh mode.

Warranty and support policies often separate major monitor manufacturers from second- and third-tier vendors. Make sure you understand t he service policies before you purchase a monitor.

The Best Overall winner, the NEC MultiSync XE17 , is Microsoft Plug-and-Play-compatible. This means that a Plug and Play computer system can communicate with the XE17 to identify available setup options that both devices support. A list of optimal configuration options pops up, and the drivers will be included in the operating system--you don't need to install them. The XE17 offers excellent contrast, but its overall display-quality score is only slightly above average, due to its relatively low distortion index. An efficient internal power management system, coupled with above-average features and excellent usability propelled this unit to the number-one rating.

Two Nanao models placed among the top in the 17-inch category. The FlexScan T2-17 ($1299) uses a Sony picture tube, and it excelled in the DisplayMate image-quality test. The FlexScan F560i-W ($1279) uses a Toshiba picture tube, offers a bove-average image quality, provides higher contrast, and exhibits less distortion than the FlexScan T2-17. The FlexScan F560i-W's front control panel is more sophisticated than the FlexScan T2-17's. However, you can access the FlexScan T2-17's advanced features using an on-screen menu. The two 17-inch Nanao monitors offer superb features and above-average usability--they should, considering their price tags.

The Samtron SC-728SXL ranks third overall and earned the best overall image-quality rating. This unit was practically free from misconvergence, and only four other monitors received a better power rating.

Both CTX International 1785GM and the 1765GM monitors placed well in the 17-inch class. The 1785GM exhibits an extremely sharp Hitachi display with a .26-mm dot pitch. The 1765GM offers better contrast and exhibits less misconvergence with its .27-mm dot-pitch Matsushita picture tube. The stylish monitors look identical from the front.

The Sony Multiscan 17se is second only to the Samtron SC-728SXL in our High Quality category. Sony's Trinitron display technology produces vibrant, fully saturated colors. The Multiscan 17se's three factory preset color modes and one user-adjustable color mode let you adjust on-screen colors to match printouts.


Weighting for Best Overall

DISPLAY                        40%
   Sharpness         40%
   Legibility        30%
   Convergence       20%
   Contrast          10%
OVERALL FEATURES               40%
   Quality           20%
   Features          20%
   Usability         20%
POWER CONSUMPTION              15%
DISTORTION                      5%




Weighting for High Quality

DISPLAY                        40%
   Sharpness         40%
   Legibility        30%
   Convergence       20%
   Contrast          10%
IMAGE QUALITY                  45%
DISTORTION                     10%




NEW AND IMPROVED FROM NEC


BEST OVERALL:  NEC MultiSync XE17


NEC has always produced high-quality monitors, and the MultiSync
XE17is no exception. When connected to a Plug and Play system, it
nego-tiates an optimal configuration and offers that as the default
setting. Its power management conforms to the VESA DPMS (Display
Power Management Signaling) method. Front-panel buttons let you
easily navigate through on-screen menus and adjust control settings.
The color accuracy of the monitor can also be customized. NEC uses a
flat-screen CRT, and its multilayered screen coating reduces glare
and contributes to an excellent screen-contrast rating. The monitor
received an excellent usability rating, due in part to its superb
documentation.

                                          OVERALL QUALITY FEATURES   DOT
                                  PRICE   SCORE   INDEX   SCORE      PITCH
BEST      NEC MultiSync XE17      $1060   ****    ****    ****      .28
RUNNER-UP Nanao FlexScan T2-1
7    $1299   ****    ****    ****      .25
RUNNER-UP Samtron SC-728SXL       $850    ****    ****    ***       .28
RUNNER-UP CTX 1785GM              $1049   ****    ****    ****      .26
RUNNER-UP Samsung SyncMaster 17GL $849    ****    ****    ***       .28
RUNNER-UP IBM 17P                 $1260   ****    ****    ****      .26

                                  MAXIMUM    MAXIMUM         832x624
                                  DISPLAY    RESOLUTION      OR HIGHER
                                  AREA (MM)  NONINTERLACED   MAC SUPPORT
BEST      NEC MultiSync XE17      316x237    1024x768         x
RUNNER-UP Nanao FlexScan T2-17    328x242    1600x1200        x
RUNNER-UP Samtron SC-728SXL       320x240    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP CTX 1785GM              325x225    1600x1280        x
RUNNER-UP Samsung SyncMaster 17GL 320x240    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP IBM 17P                 315x235    1600x1200        x

Key
Excellent ****
Good      ***
Fair      **
Poor      *




A REMARKABLE IMAGE FROM SAMTRON


HIGH QUALITY:  Samtron SC-728SXL


The Samtron's high quality ranking is due mainly to its excellent
performance in the convergence test. The unit's average was only .02
mm (the Philips and MegaImage models were its closest competitors at
.029 mm). The Samtron features antistatic CRT coating, flat-screen
CRT technology, and above-average contrast. Although it employs
dynamic focusing, its image sharpness was only average. And it
performed below the norm in the legibility test. The Script font was
not legible below 14 points (13 points was the average for 17-inch
monitors), and the Times Roman and Arial fonts were not readable when
their point size was smaller than six (the average being five points).

                                          OVERALL QUALITY FEATURES   DOT
                                  PRICE   SCORE   INDEX   SCORE      PITCH
BEST      Samtron SC-728SXL       $850    ****    ****    ***
        .28
RUNNER-UP Sony Multiscan 17se     $1250   ***     ****    ***        .25
RUNNER-UP Dyna Micro MON-172GLR   $699    ***     ****    ***        .28
RUNNER-UP CTX 1765GM              $999    ***     ****    ***        .27
RUNNER-UP Megatron MegaImage      $679    ***     ****    ***        .28
RUNNER-UP ADI MicroScan 5EP       $769    ***     ****    **         .28

                                  MAXIMUM    MAXIMUM         832x624
                                  DISPLAY    RESOLUTION      OR HIGHER
                                  AREA (MM)  NONINTERLACED   MAC SUPPORT
BEST      Samtron SC-728SXL       320x240    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP Sony Multiscan 17se     300x225    1600x1200        x
RUNNER-UP Dyna Micro MON-172GLR   300x225    1280x1024
RUNNER-UP CTX 1765GM              325x245    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP Megatron MegaImage      300x225    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP ADI MicroScan 5EP       320x240    1280x1024

Key
Excellent ****
Good      ***
Fair      **
P
oor      *




LOW COST, LOW POWER, HIGH QUALITY


LOW COST (UNDER $800):  ADI MicroScan 5EP


With its $769 MSRP, the ADI MicroScan 5EP finished as our Low Cost
winner. It offers higher contrast and produced a lower distortion
index than that of the Samtron SC-728SXL. The MicroScan 5EP's power
rating indicates the efficiency of the system's internal power
management system; however, its .28-mm dot pitch, lower-than-average
number of user-definable modes (only eight), and lack of an on-screen
menu adversely affected its features rating. Digital contrast and
brightness controls are located on the front of the unit; more
sophisticated controls (i.e., horizontal phase and width, vertical
size and shift, and degauss) are located behind a protective cover.

                                          OVERALL QUALITY FEATURES   DOT
                                  PRICE   SCORE   INDEX   SCORE      PITCH
BEST      ADI MicroScan 5EP       $769    ***     ***
*    **         .28
RUNNER-UP Orchestra Tuba-II       $795    ***     ****    ****       .26
RUNNER-UP Megatron MegaImage      $679    ***     ****    ***        .28
RUNNER-UP NSA Hitachi Super 17s   $795    ***     ****    ***        .26

                                  MAXIMUM    MAXIMUM         832x624
                                  DISPLAY    RESOLUTION      OR HIGHER
                                  AREA (MM)  NONINTERLACED   MAC SUPPORT
BEST      ADI MicroScan 5EP       320x240    1280x1024
RUNNER-UP Orchestra Tuba-II       330x241    1600x1200
RUNNER-UP Megatron MegaImage      300x225    1280x1024        x
RUNNER-UP NSA Hitachi Super 17s   316x237    1280x1024        x

Key
Excellent ****
Good      ***
Fair      **
Poor      *



NEC MultiSync XE17

photo_link


Samtron SC-728SXL

photo_link


Up to the BYTE Lab Product Report section contentsGo to previous article: 62 Big, Beautiful Color MonitorsGo to next article: Colorific Color Management SoftwareSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network