Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesOne in 9 Billion


January 1995 / Letters / One in 9 Billion

It appears a bug is in the FPU of many Pentium processors. The Pentium FPU returns erroneous values for certain division operations. For example, an error is obtained by calculating 1/(1/x) for values in the range 824633702418 < = x < = 824633702449 and throughout any interval obtained by multiplying or dividing the above interval by an integer power of 2. Other intervals also produce division errors. These errors can be verified in compiled code, an ordinary spreadseet, or even the Windows calculator in scientific mode.

We observed the bug on all the Pentiums we tested, including a Dell P90, a Gateway P90, a Micron P60, an Insight P60, and a Packard-Bell P60. It has not been observed on any 486 or earlier system. I am interested in hearing of test results from other Pentiums, from 486-DX4s, and from the AMD, Cyrix, and NexGen clones of the Pentium.

Dr. Thomas R. Nicely
Professor of Mathematics
Lynchburg College, VA

We tested Dr. Nicely's claims on various Pentium machines, and the error is as described. We contacted Intel, and John Thompson, an Intel spokesperson, confirmed our findings. However, the error is confined to the lowest bits of the mantissa (usually the lower 9 or 10 bits), so it is unlikely that anyone would encounter it. Thompson said that Intel's statistical analysis of the bug indicated the problem would occur once every 9 to 10 billion operand pairs (an operand pair being an expression such as a+b, ab, and ab). Corrected Pentium processors are already in the manufacturing pipeline. Finally, Thompson said that readers should contact Intel if their particular applications run afoul of the bug and that Intel will "work with them to solve the problem." --Rick Grehan


Up to the Letters section contentsGo to next article: The Future Is NowSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network