Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesPentium OverDrive = Moderate Upgrade


June 1995 / News & Views / Pentium OverDrive = Moderate Upgrade
Tom R. Halfhill

Intel's Pentium OverDrive processor is a compromise design. It puts a rocket in your socket, all right, but the upgrade socket has a 32-bit, 486-style I/O bus--not the faster, wider, 64-bit bus of a regular Pentium. The resulting bottleneck keeps the Pentium OverDrive from delivering as much performance as you might expect ( see the BYTE benchmark table ).

Still, it's faster than a 486, and Intel did a few things to compensate for the narrower bus. For instance, the Pentium OverDrive has twice as much primary cache as a regular Pentium (32 KB versus 16 KB), optimized cache lines, and a 5-to-2 core-to-bus clock-speed ratio that runs the CPU at 83 MHz in a 33-MHz system or at 63 MHz in a 25-MHz system.

To keep the OverDrive cool--it ru ns much hotter than a 486--Intel strapped a high-reliability fan on the chip. A small TSR program monitors the fan's rpm rate; if the fan slows down or stops, an error message pops up on the screen, and the CPU throttles back its clock speed to prevent a meltdown.

With a street sticker price of about $400, the Pentium OverDrive is a reasonable upgrade if your 486 system is otherwise adequate. You will also spend less time upgrading your office if you've kept good records about whose 486 systems are Pentium-upgradable--and which ones are not. But with prices of full-fledged Pentium systems plunging, you might be better off saving your money for a whole new computer.


PENTIUM OVERDRIVE YIELDS MODEST GAINS

The DOS version of BYTE's Native Mode benchmarks shows the
performance of a 25-MHz 486 Zeos Pantera upgraded with a Pentium
OverDrive chip to be less than that of a 90-MHz Pentium. The Pantera
system we tested had a write-back cache. Intel estimates
 that 486
systems with write-back caches perform about 15 percent faster than
similar systems with write-through caches after they have been
upgraded. Many older 486 systems have write-through caches, but Intel
says that by the end of this year, most 486 systems will ship with
write-back caches.

                        
ZEOS 25-MHZ     PANTERA WITH
                        486 PANTERA     PENTIUM OVERDRIVE

Integer index           .216            .704
FPU index               .135            .618

A 90-MHz Dell Pentium = 1.


Up to the News & Views section contentsGo to previous article: Vendors Ride Bus to Better TelephonyGo to next article: Getting Clear About FuzzySearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM   TE
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network