Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesThe Best In Ultrafast Graphics Adapters


February 1996 / BYTE Lab Product Report / The Best In Ultrafast Graphics Adapters

Whenever someone says that he or she is updating a PC, the first components that usually come to mind are a larger hard drive, a RAM upgrade, or maybe a faster modem for Internet browsing. But the growing lust for multimedia and all its glitzy imagery has pushed 64-bit graphics adapters to the top of many users' upgrade wish lists. The boards we tested offer a wide range of options.

The lower-end cards are below the $200 mark, so now you can enjoy flicker-free screens on bigger monitors. The more expensive and faster boards use video memory, and Matrox Graphics' MGA Millennium ( our best 32-bit-color choice ) goes a step further by using Window RAM (WRAM).

Opti mized for Windows, WRAM is the latest in graphics memory technology, and it helped the MGA Millennium to top all the other cards in our InterMark 32-bit-color benchmarks . WRAM's 256-bit-wide internal buses transport data at 1.6 GBps, resulting in fast Windows drawing operations, such as rectangular fills and color-text expansion.

Elsa America's Gloria 4 ( our best-overall choice ) costs a whopping $2990, but it utilizes a 3DLabs' Glint chip for 3-D acceleration. Diamond's Stealth Video 3400 XL ($569) offers 30-frame-per-second playback on a full screen instead of in a teeny window if you attach an optional MPEG daughtercard. Any video played back at less than 30 fps appears jerky, not broadcast-quality (like you see on TV or at the movies).

For our best-overall category , we combined the performance numbers of the cards at two different resolutions: 1024 by 768 pixels and 1280 by 1024, set at 256 (8-bit) color s. These resolutions and color settings are what you'll find on a typical business desktop system.

Although the Gloria 4 wins our best-overall category, STB Systems' Velocity 64 Video ($500) uses an S3 Vision 968 accelerator chip and 4 MB of extended-data-out (EDO) video memory to breeze through our benchmarks. A digital-video window control allows full-motion playback of all Display Control Interface (DCI)-compliant video clips, including Audio Video Interleave (AVI), MPG, Indeo, and Video CD. Its Windows Display Control utility provides easy switches between color depths, a virtual desktop, and a zoom window for taking closer looks at different areas of the desktop.

Number Nine's Imagine 128 Pro was also a strong performer in our lower-resolution benchmarks and second best in our 32-bit-color tests. The Imagine 128 Pro 128-bit bus width provides snappy performance. The $699 card (with 4 MB of video memory) is available with 2, 4, or 8 MB of video memory and supports 16.7 million colors at a re solution of 1600 by 1200 pixels when fully loaded with video memory.

AsusTek's PCIV192, a 192-bit accelerator, didn't perform nearly as well as the Imagine 128 Pro. The PCIV192 board uses a parallel architecture with three S3 Vision 864 graphics chips controlling RGB; each engine has its own 2 MB of dedicated video memory. The $499 card's three-pronged approach to pixelation is slow compared to that of the other video memory-based boards, perhaps because its drivers aren't optimized for Windows 95.

The VideoLogic Graphix Star 700's ($449) and Actix Systems GE Ultra 64 AV-4MB's ($399) InterMark scores were almost identical, but the GE Ultra 64 was faster by a mere whisker. The overall edge goes to the Graphix Star 700 because it offers more features and supports higher refresh rates and more colors at higher resolutions.

Hercules's Graphics Terminator Professional ($559) was a strong performer in all our benchmarks. It incorporates an S3 Vision 968 processor with 4 MB of video memory and s upports a maximum refresh rate of 150 Hz.

In our high-resolution category, we tested the add-in cards at 1600 by 1200 pixels at 256 colors, which eliminated four of the lower-end boards. Cards that support this resolution are ideal for desktop publishing, image processing, and photo-realistic rendering. VideoLogic's Graphix Star 700 and STB Systems' Velocity 64 Video outperform the Elsa Winner 2000Pro/X-4 ( our best high-resolution pick ), but the Winner 2000Pro/X-4 has more features.

Our low-cost category comprised only those boards with as-tested prices of under $400. At $399, the Actix GE Ultra 64 AV-4MB won this category with a strong performance score. The STB PowerGraph 64 Video follows the Actix in performance and costs just $250.


Weightings for Best Overall and Low Cost


PERFORMANCE:
                  75%
1024 x 768 x 256     37.5%
1280 x 1
024 x 256    37.5%

FEATURES:
                     15%

USABILITY:
                    10%



Weightings for 32-bit Color and High Resolution


PERFORMANCE:
                  75%
1024 x 768 x 32-bit    37.5%
1600 x 1200 x 8-bit    37.5%

FEATURES:
                     15%

USABILITY:
                    10%




Best Overall: Elsa America Gloria 4

Elsa America's Gloria 4 has the second-fastest InterMark performance
with resolutions of 1024 by 768 pixels, as well as 1280 by 1024
pixels at 256 colors. Configured for testing at $2990, this video
memory -- based board costs over 10 times as much as the other boards
tested here, but it utilizes a 3DLabs' Glint chip for 3-D
acceleration, making it ideal for CAD users with fat wallets.

                                                      
ACCELERATOR
                                  PRICE   RAM (MB)    CONTROLLER

BEST      Elsa Gloria 4           $2990   4 VRAM      S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP Elsa Winner 2000Pro/X-4 $545    4 VRAM      S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP Matrox MGA Millennium   $948    8 WRAM      MGA-2064W
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   $500    4 EDO VRAM  S3 Vision 968


                                  
PERFORMANCE FEATURES USABILITY OVERALL
                                  SCORE       INDEX    INDEX     SCORE

BEST      Elsa Gloria 4           9.75        ***      ***       9.38
RUNNER-UP Elsa Winner 2000Pro/X-4 9.73        ***      ***       9.37
RUNNER-UP Matrox MGA Millennium   9.78        ***      ***       9.35
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   9.7         ***      ***       9.16



KEY

Ratings from 1 to 4: * is the lowest; **** is the highest.





32-Bit Color: Matrox Graphics MGA Millennium

The MGA Millennium is the only board we tested with WRAM, which
provides video memory-level performance at near-DRAM prices. The MGA
Millennium came loaded with 8 MB of video memory and supports a
lightning-fast 200-Hz noninterlaced refresh rate. Although the $948
price tag is steep, the board has 3-D capabilities, excellent
performance under all conditions, and a host of accompanying utility
software, including a software MPEG video player.

                                                    
ACCELERATOR
                                  PRICE   RAM (MB)  CONTROLLER

BEST      Matrox MGA Millennium   $948    8 WRAM    MGA-2064W
RUNNER-UP Number Nine Imagine
          128 Pro                 $699    4 VRAM    Number Nine Imagine128
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   $500    4 VRAM    S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP Elsa Gloria 4           $2990   4 VRAM    S3 Vision 968


                                  
PERFORMANCE FEATURES USABILITY OVERALL

                                  SCORE       INDEX    INDEX     SCORE

BEST      Matrox MGA Millennium   9.89        ***      ***       9.43
RUNNER-UP Number Nine Imagine
          128 Pro                 9.9         ****     ***       9.41
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   10          ***      ***       9.38
RUNNER-UP Elsa Gloria 4           9.29        ***      ***       9.04



KEY

Ratings from 1 to 4: * is the lowest; **** is the highest.





High Resolution: Elsa America Winner 2000Pro/X-4

Elsa America's Winner 2000Pro/X-4 combines an S3 Vision graphics
accelerator with 4 MB of video memory for the third-best InterMark
performance in our high-end 1600-by 1200-pixel benchmarks. In true
color, the $545 card maintains a refresh rate of over 100 Hz when set
at resolutions of 1280 by 768 pixels. If you want to pump up
performance, you can add another 4 MB of video memory.


                                                      
ACCELERATOR
                                  PRICE   RAM (MB)    CONTROLLER

BEST      Elsa Winner 2000Pro/X-4 $545    4 VRAM      S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP VideoLogic Graphix
          Star 700                $449    4 VRAM      S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP Elsa Gloria 4           $2990   4 VRAM      S3 Vision 968
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   $500    4 EDO VRAM  S3 Vision 968


                                  
PERFORMANCE FEATURES USABILITY OVERALL
                                  SCORE       INDEX    INDEX     SCORE

BEST      Elsa Winner 2000Pro/X-4 9.89        ***      ***       9.49
RUNNER-UP VideoLogic Graphix
          Star 700                10          ***      ***       9.45
RUNNER-UP Elsa Gloria 4           9.77        ***      ***       9.39
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video   9.93        ***      ***       9.33



KEY

Ratings from 1 to 4: * is the lowest; **** is the highest.





Low Cost: Actix GE Ultra 64 AV-4MB

The Actix GE Ultra 64 AV-4MB ($399) came with 4 MB of video memory
and performed better than all the cards that cost under $400. The GE
Ultra 64 supports 1600- by 1200-pixel resolution, and 32-bit color at
lower resolutions.

                                                         
ACCELERATOR
                                     PRICE   RAM (MB)    CONTROLLER

BEST      Actix CE Ultra 64 AV 4MB   $399    4 VRAM      S3 86C968
RUNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video      $250    2 EDO DRAM  S3 Trio64+
RUNNER-UP Boca Research Voyager 64   $189    2 DRAM      S3 Trio64
RUNNER-UP Hercules StingRay 64/Video $259    2 EDO DRAM  ARK 2000PV


                                     
PERFORMANCE FEATURES USABILITY OVERALL
                                     SCORE       INDEX    INDEX     SCORE

BEST      Actix CE Ultra 64 AV 4MB   9.25        **       ***       8.68
R
UNNER-UP STB Velocity 64 Video      9.17        **       ***       8.62
RUNNER-UP Boca Research Voyager 64   8.71        **       ***       8.30
RUNNER-UP Hercules StingRay 64/Video 8.08        **       **        7.63



KEY

Ratings from 1 to 4: * is the lowest; **** is the highest.




Elsa America Gloria 4

photo_link (6 Kbytes)


Matrox Graphics MGA Millenium

photo_link (6 Kbytes)


Elsa America Winner 2000Pro/X-4

photo_link (6 Kbytes)


Actix GE Ultra 64 AV-4MB

photo_link (7 Kbytes)


Up to the BYTE Lab Product Report section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: MPEG: Pay For PlaySearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network