Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

Articles6 Servers Tangle on the Web


March 1996 / BYTE Lab Product Report / 6 Servers Tangle on the Web

Make your presence known on the Web with these powerful turnkey server solutions. We saturate the systems with request loads that simulate TCP/IP traffic jams on the Internet.

Chandrika Mysore and Brent Melson

If your company isn't on the Internet yet, then take a look at the six Web servers we've tested and see just how easy it is to get your message on-line. In the past year, more big-name systems vendors have joined the Web fray with RISC- and Pentium-based servers that are bundled with Web software--you don't have to be a Unix guru to create and maintain a home page. We tested five RISC-based systems (with Alpha, PowerPC, and Sparc processors) and a dual-processor Pentium system to see which one best handles the different FTP and HTTP request loa ds you will encounter once you open shop in cyberspace.

For this Lab Report, we requested that manufacturers supply us with turnkey systems that have their choice of Web software installed and configured for testing; thus, we could see how easy it is to set up each system as a Web serve r with minimal end-user intervention. We wanted to test how close each of the systems comes to actually being a turnkey solution.

The six servers all came with a high-end processor, such as a SuperSparc, MicroSparc, Alpha, PowerPC, or dual Pentiums, with speeds ranging from 75 to 266 MHz. We also had a mix of OSes: Solaris 5.4, Irix 5.3, Windows NT Server 3.51, and Apple System 7.5. Three of the vendors--Silicon Graphics, Sun Microsystems, and Intergraph--selected Netscape Communications' Server 1.22 for their Web software. Digital Equipment provided Process Software's Purveyor 1.1, and Apple selected StarNine Technologies' WebStar 1.2.4.

In terms of price, Tatung's MicroCompstation 5/11 is the least expensive server here; it costs $8635 with monitor. The next least-expensive server we tested is Apple's Workgroup Server 9150 at $8799, which targets small businesses. The Digital Equipment Internet AlphaServer 1000 4/266 is the highest at $20,690. All the prices listed here are for the configurations as we tested them and the software bundled with the systems.

We tested the servers under TCP/IP in two scenarios that most likely represent real-world use. The first scenario stresses the FTP aspect of the server, using 88 percent of FTP requests and 6 percent each of HTTP and Wide Area Information Service (WAIS) requests. The second scenario represents the most common usage pattern of HTTP services, stressing the servers with 97 percent of HTTP, 2 percent of FTP, and 1 percent of WAIS requests. These scenarios simulate the different traffic patterns that Web servers have to handle over the Internet.

Web servers can be used by small businesses (e.g., ad agencies, marketing firms, or consultants) or by large corporations as in-house servers. The server loads differ for small and large sites. If you are looking for a server to handle thousands or tens of thousands of hits a day, then you need a system capable of listening to all the requests and responding to them in an orderly fashion, while not missing any requests; this solution is not inexpensive. Sites facing lower levels of traffic require less horsepower and could get by with a lower-cost server. The amount of expected traffic is the key to your buying decision. Virtually any advanced PC can act as a Web server, but it takes some muscle to handle a really cool site on the Web.


HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE

We ranked the best Web servers based on their performance scores, features, and ease of use.

Performance Ratings: These ratings are calculated from the individual performance scores generated from FTP and HT TP transactions. We varied the number of client sessions that access the server, ranging from eight to 48 virtual clients.

Price (without monitor): Check the Roll Call on pages 132 to 133 (not available on-line) to see if the system is available without the monitor. Buying a high-resolution monitor is overkill if you're going to be using the system as a dedicated server.

Length of Standard Warranty: Warranty and support policies vary from one to three years. Check the Roll Call under this heading to see if the vendor offers extended warranties and how long technical support lasts.


Unraveling the Web

illustration_link (100 Kbytes)


Up to the BYTE Lab Product Report section contentsGo to next article: Heavy-Duty Web ServersSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network