Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesTriumphant Technologists


July 1996 / Editorial / Triumphant Technologists

Just flew in from Las Vegas and boy are my arms tired -- mainly from lugging tons of Web brochures at the Networld + Interop show.

Mark Schlack, Editor in Chief

OK, I'm tired of all the hype, too. At the recent Networld + Interop show, I saw a modem marketed as "Internet Ready." Imagine that! Can we please trivialize this important technology just a little more? Maybe the Internet Engineering Task Force should hire Andre Agassi to do his "Image is everything" shtick for the Internet.

Sometimes, though, where there's sizzle there actually is steak. And nowhere is this more true than in the growing intranet movement. In this issue of BYTE, the next issue, and repeatedly over the next few months, we'll be digging into intranet technology to find its strengths and li mits. Jon Udell, our Web Project editor, will be focusing on the intranet in his column for the coming year. He offers a lot of useful advice.

While you're absorbing all Jon's intranet goodies, consider this: Conventional wisdom has it that technologists have lost the momentum in steering corporate technology policy. Business managers are tired of that inward focus, according to this line of thought. Reengineering has put the technologists back where they "belong"--implementing other people's visions. Really? It sounds like somebody forgot to check who's driving the intranet, and where it's headed.

The intranet marks the resurgence of forward-looking technologists who have struggled mightily over the last decade to establish open distributed computing in the enterprise. Why? Not only, or even mainly, because they have a religious belief in standards. This movement has been about control: Computer users should control their resources. And they can do this only when they are able to ex ercise the ultimate sanction against vendors who produce products that don't meet their needs: Replace them. It's only the technologists in the corporate world who've had the vision to sort through claims like "Internet Ready" and establish long-lasting architectures that will survive both vendor and management attachment to various visions du jour.

The intranet is nothing less than an attempt to escape from the most onerous aspects of client/server computing as it has evolved to this point: dependence on expensive relational database management systems, lock-ins to proprietary 4GL environments, and the inability to write one application, one time, and have clients access it from any desktop anywhere.

That last point marks a big difference between the new, savvy Internet technologists and the gnu-savvy Unix diehards of only a few years ago: The former's vision is far more focused on giving the corporate end-user community what it wants, needs, and can afford, even when those same users don't qui te know what those things are. Where did this new breed of technologist come from? Many are the old breed, grown wiser; some are Young Turks with no legacy to defend as yet.

Will the intranet concept succeed totally? Not a chance. Is it always the right approach? As this month's cover story shows, not always, and not everywhere. But one thing's for sure--next time you hear somebody dissing the IT community for having no business sense, ask them which high-priced management consultant or smart CEO invented the intranet, thereby cutting application development times and slashing software license fees.

The products at this year's Networld + Interop certainly proved that today's technologist has learned his or her lesson. Keep the end users happy, align IT plans with business goals, and--oh yes, one more thing I learned in Las Vegas--never put all your money on one horse.


Mark Schlack, Editor in Chief, href=mailto:mschlack@bix.com > mschlack@bix.com

Up to the Editorial section contentsSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM   Co
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network