Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesCyrix 6x86 Matches Pentium


September 1996 / Bits / Cyrix 6x86 Matches Pentium

Application benchmarks show that Cyrix's new 6x86 processor deserves its "200" label.

Dave Andrews

Although the 6x86-P200+ runs at just 150 MHz, application benchmarks indicate that Cyrix's newest processor lives up to its name, delivering the same or better performance than a 200-MHz Pentium. Although results of the CPU/FPU BYTEmark test indicate that the 6x86 has poor floating-point performance (a score of 0.43, compared to 1.0 for a 90-MHz Dell Pentium system), this won't hurt the performance of most Windows 95 business applications.

Results from running the new SYSmark/32 applications benchmark on Win 95 put a 6x86 PC computer from Cyrix slightly ahead of a Dell Dimension XPS P200S with a 200-MHz Pentium ( see the chart ). The SYSmark/32 benchmark suite, f rom Business Applications Performance Corp. (BAPCo), exercises popular word processing (Microsoft Word 7.0 and Lotus WordPro 96), spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 7.0), database (Paradox 7.0), desktop graphics (CorelDraw 6.0), desktop-presentation (Microsoft Powerpoint 7.0 and Lotus Freelance 96), and desktop publishing (Adobe Pagemaker 6.0) applications.

Although we compared similarly configured systems (both had 32 MB of RAM, a Matrox MGA Millenium graphics adapter, and a SCSI hard drive), differences between the Cyrix and Dell exist. The Cyrix system that we tested (which costs about $1500) was equipped with a 4-GB SCSI hard drive, 64 MB of RAM, a 75-MHz bus, extended data out (EDO) RAM, and a 256-KB synchronous pipeline burst cache, compared to the Dell system's 66-MHz bus, synchronous DRAM, and 512-KB pipeline burst cache.

To gauge the comparison of the two systems to a low-end PC, we also tested a 90-MHz Dell with 16 MB of RAM. The results show that power users shopping for a fast, affordable PC should investigate the latest from Cyrix ((800) 340-7501; http://www.cyrix.com ). A 6x86-P200+ PC with a 256-KB cache, 16 MB of EDO RAM, Matrox MGA millenium video, 2 MB of Window RAM (WRAM), a 15-inch monitor, a keyboard, an eight-speed CD-ROM drive, a 2.5-GB Enhanced IDE (EIDE) hard drive, a floppy drive, a sound card, and speakers costs $2299.


Cyrix Leads in Application Performance

illustration_link (14 Kbytes)

The Cyrix P200 + PC edges the 200-MHz Pentium Dell XPS.


Up to the Bits section contentsGo to next article: Geek MystiqueSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network