Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesDatapro Report


Novembe r 1996 / Bits / Datapro Report

Wanted: Client/Server Expertise

Dennis Byron

High costs and lack of expertise and systems management are the major obstacles on the way to realizing the benefits of client/server computing, according to Datapro's 1996 International Client/Server Issues Survey. Information systems executives understand the cost implications of client/server computing, realizing that, despite the conventional wisdom of the early 1990s, expenditures may be even higher than those of a monolithic system. However, they also believe that the benefits outweigh the cost and other disadvantages.

Implementers said the top benefits are improved end-user access to information, the ability to flexibly react to business needs, and scalability (i.e., the ability to add additional capacity).

As expected, the trend line for full implementation of a client/server system continues strongly upward. In 1994, 18 percent of the respondents to Datapro's survey had fully implemented a client/server system. By 1995, that number increased to 25 percent, and this year, it was up to 46 percent. Of the implementers, half use a two-tier scheme, but a third use multiple-tier schemes. Additionally, about 75 percent of them incorporated legacy systems, and about one-third of those incorporated legacy systems through real-time connections, as opposed to gateways or batch data transfer.

As you can see in the chart , the perceived disadvantages of client/server computing among those who haven't implemented a system differ -- in some cases by a large margin -- from the disadvantages as stated by those who have completed their systems. Nonimplementers seem to have less awareness of the pitfalls of immature standards, system management, and the lack of development tools compared to those who have already implemented a client/server system. Of this year's respondents, 29 percent are still making client/server plans. Those who are still in the planning process might want to reevaluate how many resources they plan to devote to trouble areas such as systems management and immature standards.


Real and Perceived Obstacles Compared

illustration_link (21 Kbytes)

Those not implementing a client/server system underestimate the obstacles of management and immature standards.


Dennis Byron is a senior analyst for Datapro Information Services. For more information on Datapro Information Services: (800) 328-2776, (609) 764-0100, or http://www.datapro.com .

Up to the Bits section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: Notebook Screen Future: Bigger and WiderSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network