Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesMemory Lane


February 199 7 / Inbox / Memory Lane

In the text box "Hardware Platforms with 64-bit Muscle" (November 1996 Special Report, page 144) you mentioned that the Pentium uses 64-bit arithmetic operations and internal data paths. But don't Pentiums also have a 64-bit path to main memory? In the article "The x86 Gets Faster with Age" in the same issue, Tom R. Halfhill states that the Cyrix 6x86 "handily beats a comparable Pentium" but that it can't match the higher core speeds of the Pentium and lacks MMX.

Why should Cyrix attempt to get the 6x86 to match the core speed of a Pentium when it has the ability to outrun the Pentium at a lower clock speed? And right now, all proccesors lack MM X. In my opinion, the 6x86 is a better chip than the Pentium, and it's less expensive, too.

Chris Nightingale
chrisn@planet.eon.net

Yes, it 's true that the Pentium has a 64-bit I/O interface to main memory. The same goes for all fifth- and sixth-generation x86 processors.

Here's why it would be useful for Cyrix to make the 6x86 run at higher clock speeds: At 150 MHz, the 6x86 closely matches the performance of Intel's 200-MHz Pentium, but it can't match the performance of the 200-MHz Pentium Pro. If Cyrix chips could achieve higher clock speeds, they could compete directly with Intel's latest CPUs instead of Intel's last-generation CPUs. As I pointed out in my story, the 6x86's lack of MMX is not the main question -- it's whether Cyrix can successfully design a CPU that's fully compatible with MMX. If Cyrix doesn't have access to the same intellectual property that Intel and AMD do, it will be more difficult for the company to devise a compatible solution. -- Tom R. Halfhill, senior editor


Up to the Inbox section contentsGo to previous article: CT or MRI?Go to next article: BYTE on CoplandSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network