Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesFatter Pipes for Workgroup Networks


May 1997 / Bits / Fatter Pipes for Workgroup Networks
Curt Harler

Thanks to an increased focus by networking vendors on small- to mid-size offices, network managers can now choose from a wide range of increasingly inexpensive solutions when upgrading their 10-Mbps Ethernet networks. The volume of traffic on many networks is up, due to new Internet, intranet, client/server, and image-based applications. Vendors and analysts alike say managers of many workgroup- and modest-size business networks plan on upgrading those networks this year. Naturally, network vendors are moving quickly to provide products for this audience.

"Customers are migrating from shared to switched and Fast Ethernet technology," says Esmeralda Silva, an analyst at research firm International Data Corp. (IDC, Framingham, MA). "Every major networking vendor, through families of products designed specifically for the small- to mid-size office, is targeting the SOHO market."

The list of vendors currently targeting this market with specific lines of products is long; it includes Bay Networks, with its Netgear line; Cisco, with its NetBeyond family of LAN connectivity and remote-access products; and 3Com, with its Office Connect line. Many other companies are also competing in the game, including Accton Technology, Compaq, D-Link, Intel, LANart, Matrox Networks, and others. "There has been tremendous growth in low-end products, since small businesses are often more concerned with pricing and less with brand name," Silva explains.

Deciding to upgrade might actually be easier than choosing which implementation -- switched 10-Mbps Ethernet, shared Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps), switched Fast Ethernet, or some combination of these options -- to upgrade to. When deciding which upgrade path is the best one to take, network managers need to co nsider a variety of different factors, including their current infrastructure and network applications.

For example, a network for a small graphic design firm -- where artists use an office suite of applications and e-mail, in addition to sharing desktop-publishing, graphics, and Web-design application files -- would be an ideal candidate for switched, or dedicated, bandwidth, according to Kimberley Peppe, spokeswoman for Matrox Networks, which offers a variety of card-based and external hubs and switches for workgroups. By moving to a switched 10-Mbps connectivity solution, such a graphic design firm can upgrade its existing shared Ethernet repeater hub to a 10-Mbps switch without having to upgrade its 10-Mbps network interface cards (NICs), too.

By giving power users and others who typically run less-bandwidth-intensive applications their own 10-Mbps pipe to the server, a 10-Mbps switched solution can improve network performance for as little as $500 (which is the cost of the switch). Meanwhile, prices continue to drop in the switched Ethernet market. For example, Matrox recently lowered the price of its Piranha Switch 8 from $699 to $499, for a price per port of $62. But different workgroups have a variety of users, applications, and plans for the future, and thus may need to opt for a Fast Ethernet solution (see the figure "Which Workgroup-Connectivity Solution?" ).

Although many businesses might find that a switched 10-Mbps solution satisfies their needs, networking vendors are setting the foundation for 100 Mbps. Prices vary, and the cost per port for Fast Ethernet hubs can range from $20 to $100 or more than switched 10-Mbps Ethernet, depending on what you buy. But vendors predict prices for Fast Ethernet hubs and switches will continue to decline. In addition, Intel and others are pricing their 10-/100-Mbps NICs to compete with 10-Mbps cards, allowing managers to buy adapters that they can use today as well as in the future.

"If you have a large file that you'r e transferring or if you're doing a large backup, it doesn't matter if the 10-Mbps connection is yours alone or shared; it will still take a long time," explains Yoseph Linde, chairman and CEO of LANart, a vendor of 10- and 100-Mbps hubs and switches, including ones that have automatic segmenting capabilities. "10-Mbps switched gives a little better performance than 10-Mbps shared, but in many cases 100-Mbps shared will deliver much better performance."


Which Workgroup-Connectivity Solution?

illustration_link (37 Kbytes)


Up to the Bits section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: Bug of the MonthSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network