Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesThe Open Force vs. the Legacy Object


July 1997 / BYTE Software Lab Report / Web Applications at Your Service / The Open Force vs. the Legacy Object

Distributing applications in this age of component software comes down to distributing objects. For object architectures, there are two choices: DCOM and CORBA.

DCOM, Microsoft's Distributed Component Object Model, is built on ActiveX and OLE technologies. DCOM does Windows -- NT Server, that is -- but not Unix, the historical de facto standard for Internet servers. So far, you're stuck with Microsoft if you want to use DCOM to distribute your applications, but Software AG c urrently has a product in beta that extends OLE and ActiveX to Unix servers.

Lotus and Netscape take the open road with the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), which offers a more complete object architecture than DCOM. Specified by the Object Management Group (OMG), CORBA promises a way to implement objects to be shared across machines, even when those objects run on different OSes.

Netscape plans to offer the JavaScripting of Java, CORBA objects, and support for CORBA services and IIOP when Netscape Enterprise Server 3.0 ships in the second quarter. Lotus is planning on exposing Domino back-end classes via Java this summer and extending this exposure to IIOP by year's end.

CORBA's strong suits are its platform independence and its provision for transaction processing as a part of its specification. DCOM is currently a single-platform solution, and Microsoft's transaction services are built on top of DCOM; it boasts an installed user base of over 50 million a nd tight integration with the Windows OS.

Netscape is not alone in considering DCOM to be a proprietary architecture, but Microsoft contends that while DCOM is a complete application environment, CORBA is simply a mix of specifications assembled from many software vendors' ideas about how to interpret and implement distributed objects.

If history is any indication, a bridging technology between DCOM and CORBA will evolve, and the debate will subside. For now, expect to hear a lot of noise on each one's benefits.


Up to the BYTE Software Lab Report section contentsGo to previous article: The Open Force vs. the Legacy ObjectGo to next article: These Servers Missed the BusSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network