Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesFPUs: No Contest


Augu st 1997 / Inbox / FPUs: No Contest

Do you know if Cyrix's M2 will have a better (or at least similar) FPU than Intel's Pentium? Does the M2 or AMD's K6 have a pipelined FPU? Why do Cyrix and AMD pay less attention to the FPU than anything else? If Cyrix and AMD chips had similar integer performance and a better FPU, I think their CPUs would be superior to Intel's.

Faris Elkurd
faris@uakron.edu

Intel's x86 chips definitely have better floating-point (FP) performance than AMD's or Cyrix's chips. Intel's FPUs are pipelined, and AMD's and Cyrix's are not. Intel has done other optimizations as well. However, AMD and Cyrix design their chips for the mainstream PC user, and the majority of PC applications largely consist of integer operations and don't need much FP performance. Intel wants the mainstream user, but it also wants a piece of the Unix workstation market and uses its x86 processors in supercomputers, which are mainly designed for FP-intensive applications. If FP performance really does matter to you, then you're better off with a RISC-based system. To participate in more discussions about this and related matters, try our public "chipcon" conference. You can find a link on the BYTE home page, or go directly to http://dev4.byte.com/chipcon . --Eds.


Up to the Inbox section contentsGo to previous article: A World CA?Go to next article: Global Faux PasSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM   Copyright 
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network