I disagree that my informal testing was unfair to 56K technology. U.S. Robotics' documentation clearly implies that if my phone line passes the USR LineTest diagnostic, which it did, it will support x2. I conducted supplemental tests at several locations to incorporate both long and short local loops, different telco central offices, and a variety of long-distance carriers. I also surveyed other x2 users, who reported generally mediocre perfor
mance. And, as the article states, K56flex modems were not yet available for testing.
Regarding x2's upload-speed limits, I was referring to the theoretical capability of the technology. The USRFAQ states that "x2 downloads (receives data) at up to 56 Kbps. It uploads (sends data) at up to 33.6 Kbps."
As for the issue of "dropping down," a USR product manager says we both make valid points: x2 servers initially connect at 33.3 Kbps and then, within a couple of seconds, establish the "initial connect speed"; it's part of the protocol negotiation. x2 clients report only this second, usually higher, speed. There's no dropping down from the initial connect speed to 33.3 Kbps. But the negotiation starts at 33.3 Kbps. --Robert L. Hummel
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it
is
theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.
BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin,
and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing
you critical news and information about wireless communication,
computer security, software development, embedded systems,
and more!