Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesTest Results


September 1997 / BYTE Hardware Lab Report / Test Results

Our benchmark tests represent overall system performance under a demanding OS (Windows NT 4.0) and intensive applications. The range of performance tests reflects real-world applications that typical BYTE readers use: Microsoft Access (database test) and C++ 4.3 (language test), plus the Fourier test (WAV file analysis), IMark (graphics test), and our low-level BYTEmark CPU test. None of our benchmark tests, however, included applications recompiled for MMX technology -- a feature that the PII can certainly take advantage of.

Performance Tests

In the Fourier test, we ran simultaneous copies of the floating-point-intensive Fourier transform program. This program analyzes the spectral content of a WAV file; its results are largely dependent on raw floating-point power.

The second processor test measures how fast a system can build (i.e., compile and link) a large amount of source code by running two simultaneous instances of version 4.3 of Visual C++. This benchmark produces results that also depend on hard disk I/O performance, because the tested systems must access their hard disks often for both reading and writing when running the test.

The Access test is the lone application-based benchmark in this suite. Using Microsoft's Visual Test 4.0 compiler, it measured how well these PII systems could generate multiple business-database transactions. It executes two iterations of test runs.

The IMark video tests were conducted at 640- by 480-pixel resolution with 256 colors, using each vendor's preinstalled graphics driver.

The single-threaded BYTEmark test exercises the capabilities of a system's CPU, FPU, and memory system.

Usability and Features

We examined each of the 17 reviewed machines for usability by focusing on system design and documentation. System design is important; therefore, we rate how easy it is to remove and reinstall the cover, for example. Ease of upgradability (for adding RAM and mass-storage devices) adds points to the usability score. We look for accessible memory slots and drive bays that offer room for cabling. Systems are penalized for having I/O connectors that are blocked by an expansion slot.

We give top honors to systems with vendor-specific manuals that are comprehensive, include easy-to-use diagrams, and offer up-to-date technical information. Manuals with a glossary and an index get better scores. Those that lack specifications for the motherboard, hard disk, and graphics subsystem get rated lower.

Each vendor completes a lengthy questionnaire that we send to provide a detailed description of each system's features and support options. We weight each feature and calculate an overall features score. Features related to performance include the size and write policy of the secondary cache. The use of hard disk controllers, network adapters, and graphics adapters on the motherboard frees up expansion slots. The amount of video memory supplied with the system is critical in determining the maximum display resolution. We weight the highest noninterlaced display resolution supported by each system, along with the maximum number of colors at that resolution.

Finally, it's important to note that warranty and support policies are what frequently separate major system vendors from second- and third-tier vendors.


Evaluations in this report represent the judgment of BYTE editors, based on tests conducted by NSTL, Inc., as documented in a recent issue of NSTL's monthly PC Digest. To purchase a copy of the full report, contact NSTL at 625 Ridge Pike, Conshohocken, PA 19428; (610) 941-9600; fax (610) 941-9950; o


Bang for the Buck

illustration_link (38 Kbytes)


Up to the BYTE Hardware Lab Report section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: Pentium II Systems FeaturesSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network