Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesShowdown at the MMX Corral


October 1997 / Inbox / Showdown at the MMX Corral

"MMX Power for Desktop PCs" (Hardware Lab Report, July) featured a small review of AMD's K6 CPU. What a disappointment. I expected a true objective analysis of Intel vs. AMD. And in the end you say that the AMD might be a strong competitor. Might?!? From what I've read and discussed, AMD beats Intel hands-dow n (including the Pentium II): 233-MHz vs. 233-MHz, AMD wins; 200 vs. 200, AMD wins. Of course, this is all based upon a system being set up correctly.

Josh Javage
javage@aol.com

We said further on in that sidebar that as certain performance problems relating to chip sets and BIOSes are eliminated, " the K6 will be a potent competitor to the Intel CPUs." Based on our testing, we conclude that, in general, the K6 competes with the Pentium II almost clock-for-clock in integer performance but definitely lags behind in FP and MMX performance. As we said in the Lab Report, the K6 box we tested -- XI Computer's Xi K200 MTower -- "turned in a composite performance score nearly identical to that of its MMX Pentium counterparts." (Also check out our June issue, page 26.) But AMD is slightly behind Intel in offering top clock speeds: The Pentium II is available (albeit in very small quantities at very high prices) at 300 MHz, while the K6 currently peaks at 233 MHz. AMD says it will have a 300-MHz K6 by the end of the year. Intel might be at 350 to 400 MHz by then. So Intel has about a six-month lead in highest clock speeds. -- Editors


Up to the Inbox section contentsGo to previous article: NT's Not Proprietary? Ha!Go to next article: IBM Channels and I/O ProcessorsSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network