Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesThe Air Up There


November 1997 / Cover Story / The Orbiting Internet: Fiber in the Sky / The Air Up There

One easy way to distinguish among the many new satellite systems is by how high up they are. This is also one key factor in determining how many satellites a system needs for worldwide coverage and how powerful those satellites must be. If an antenna can cover 15 degrees, for example, that same arc covers a much smaller area if the satellite is 200 miles away than if it's 20,000 miles away. However, it will require much less power to deliver a signal fr om 200 miles away than from 20,000 miles away. Satellite people have four basic terms to describe different altitudes.

GEO: Short for geosynchronous earth orbit, GEO satellites orbit at 22,238 miles above the earth's equator. At this altitude, the period of rotation of the satellite around the earth is exactly 24 hours. The satellite seems to stay above exactly the same point on the earth's surface. (As a footnote, this orbit is called a Clarke orbit, named for the author Arthur C. Clarke, who first posited in 1945 that it should be possible. According to B YTE senior contributing editor Jerry Pournelle, Clarke never got the patent he sought for figuring it out.) Most of today's satellites are GEOs, as are planned broadband systems such as Hughes' Spaceway and Loral's Cyberstar.

GEOs require few satellites to cover the entire earth's surface. However, they're saddled with a 0.24-second latency for a signal to travel from earth to satellite and back to earth again. GEOs also need to obtain specific orbital slots around the equator to keep far enough apart, each separated by 2 degrees, or about 1000 miles, according to Erwin Edelman, demonstrations coordinator at NASA's Lewis Research Center. The ITU and, in the U.S., the FCC mete out these slots.

MEO: According to Marco Caceres of the Teal Group, medium earth orbit satellites orbit at altitudes between 6250 and 12,500 miles. Unlike GEOs, their position changes relative to the earth's surface. At their lower altitudes, you need more of them to achieve complete coverage of the earth's surface, but the latency reduces substantially. Right now, according to Caceres, there aren't many MEOs, and the ones in orbit are used for positioning.

LEO: Low earth orbits promise extremely high bandwidth and low latency. Plans exist for huge constellations of hundreds of satellites that will cover the entire globe. LEOs generally orbit below 3125 miles. Most of them are much lower: only 400-1000 miles. At these altitudes, latency reduces to nearly negligible times -- hundredths of a second.

Three kinds of LEOs handle different amounts of bandwidth. Little LEOs are low-bandwidth applications (tens to hundreds of Kbps) such as paging and include systems such as OrbComm. Big LEOs can handle paging, cellular services, and some data transmission (hundreds to thousands of Kbps). Examples include GlobalStar and Iridium. Broadband LEOs (sometimes called mega-LEOs) operate in the Mbps range and include Teledesic, Celestri, and Skybridge.

HALE: High-altitude, long-endurance platforms are basically a solar-powered, lightweight airplane or lighter-than-air craft that hover over an unmoving spot some 70,000 feet above the earth's surface. Not often talked about, and right now primarily a research venture. An example of a HALE that uses blimps is Skystation.


Up to the Cover Story section contentsGo to previous article: The Air Up ThereGo to next article: I'm with the BandSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network