Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesN ot Worth the Wait


December 1997 / Inbox / Not Worth the Wait

I read with interest "Oracle8: Worth the Wait?" (September review) and felt that once again, a professional in the database arena has put forward a very pro-Oracle article without comparison to other databases.

I find it surprising that Informix does not get the credit it deserves when you look at the products that are available for all platforms, including NT 4.0. Oracle is very clever when it comes to marketing jargon. What is considered to be new technology, in fact, it announced in 1992. Look at the Informix product range. You'll find that the features that everyone is so excited about in Oracle8 are old hat when it comes to the on-line DSA engine -- table fragmentation, parallel data queries (PDQs), virtual processors, hot archiving, and so forth.

Sean Kelsey
Database Consultant
Datel Computing
Preston, Lancashire, U.K.
seank@teepee.demon.co.uk

I don't think the review was too positive, given the criticisms of the complete lack of object-oriented technology, the poor programming interface, and the consequent downrating of the product. I'm not really an expert on Informix, SQL Server, or Sybase, but the real problem with these products (Sybase aside) is that, unlike Oracle, they don't run on many OSes. You can also criticize Informix for its thick-client datablade approach, the heavy-handed way it does database extensions, and a lack of relatively strong object-oriented features in all these systems. I would also criticize all these vendors for their inability to conform to a reasonable level of the SQL2 standard, much less to the upcoming SQL3 standard. --Robert J. Muller


Up to the Inbox section contentsGo to previous article: Rich Content vs. News ClientGo to next article: Solving Real ProblemsSearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network