s of thin clients, according to the survey, which was conducted by Zona Research (Redwood
City, CA), which provides Internet-related market research and advice.
The number 1 reason cited by those not planning to deploy thin clients (which include Windows-based terminals, NetPCs, Java-based network computers, Windows CE devices, and information appliances) is that the devices are not PCs (
see the chart
for more information).
"With so much hype surrounding thin clients, there may be a backlash against them," says Peter van de Graaf, director of product management for Lotus Components, a unit of IBM that was expected to release its first Java-based suite of productivity applications (code-named Kona) in November. "This backlash may be because people haven't seen enough full-featured Java applications yet."
Greg Blatnik, vice president at Zona Research, agrees the lack of Office-type applications may be the cause of some thin-client skepticism by managers, but he notes that of those in the survey planning to deploy thin clients, more than 70 p
ercent want them to be able to access Windows applications running on the server. Says Blatnik: "That indicates that the goal of coming up with a non-Windows product that kicks Microsoft off the desktop is a futile effort."
illustration_link (11 Kbytes)
