Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers Request free information on products written about or advertised in BYTE Submit a press release, or scan recent announcements Talk with BYTE's staff and readers about products and technologies

ArticlesCentralized Management for Desktops


January 1998 / Cover Story / Centralized Management for Desktops

Centralized management lowers costs and simplifies maintenance of desktop computers.

Mike Hurwicz

Organizations are increasingly waking up to the costs of managing desktop computers. For instance, the Gartner Group (Framingham, MA) estimates that the total cost of ownership (TCO) for a networked Windows 95 PC is $9784 a year. TCO includes hardware and support costs. Much of that expense comes from users changing configurations, installing applications, and plugging in cards, making every machine unique and greatly complicating troubleshooting and upgrading tasks. Users might even do things such as download pro grams that are infected with viruses, creating unnecessary and expensive crises for the whole organization.

Centralized desktop management strategies will become increasingly widespread in 1998 because of their potential for lowering TCO and protecting the corporate network. These strategies include automatic configuration, remote diagnostics, remote booting, and LAN wake-up (power-on). Company policies might also prohibit users from changing their setups or installing their own software, then denying them central support if they do. Centralized, automated management of desktops can reduce TCO by as much as 25 percent, according to estimates by the Gartner Group.

In 2Q1998, Microsoft expects to release Windows 98, which will be the first operating system to embed Zero Administration for Windows (ZAW), a Microsoft initiative promoting centralized, automated management for desktops. ZAW is out in kit form for Windows 95. ZAW can restrict users from installing unau thorized software and accessing network resources; it can also lock down machines entirely.

Sealed, low-cost, thin-profile desktop computers, such as those being built according to the Intel/Microsoft-sponsored NetPC specification, provide minor additional benefits, adding perhaps another 3 percent to the savings that are possible with centralized management. However, NetPCs are not designed to function if the network is down, since their local hard disk is only for caching. Nor can people install software locally, since there are no local storage devices such as floppy disk drives or CD-ROM drives.

Because of these limitations, even proponents like Compaq say the NetPC will garner no more than 10 to 15 percent of the market. Neutral sources such as market research firm International Data Corporation (Framingham, MA) predict market share of only 1 to 2 percent, even by 2001.

Even at these low rates of adoption, the NetPC might accomplish its primary task: countering th e publicity blitz associated with the network computer (NC) promoted by Sun, Oracle, and others. The network computer is itself now expected to garner no more than 2 percent of the market by the year 2000, according to the Gartner Group.


Where to Find


NetPC specifications are available at:


Internet: 
http://www.eu.microsoft.com/hwdev/netpc.htm



NC specs are at:


Internet: 
http://www.nc.ihost.com/nc_ref_profile.html




Information on products in the software applications category HotBYTEs - information on products covered or advertised in BYTE


NetPC vs. Network Computer

NetPC vs. Network Computer
NetPC NC
Savings in total cost of ownership 26 percent 39 percent *
Must support local hard disk? Yes No
Network speed requirements Modest High-speed
Local operation possible? Yes No
Primary target application type Windows Java
* Compared to a typical Windows 95 workstation. The cost of migrating from Windows to Java is not included in this estimate. (Source: Gartner Group)


NetPCs and NCs in 1998

illustration_link (12 Kbytes)

AT A GLANCE: Centralized management for desktops is lowering total cost of ownership by as much as 25 percent. Low-cost, sealed, thin-profile desktop machines could bring minor additional savings.

WHO SUPPORTS IT: Major proponents of centralized management include Microsoft, Intel, Sun, HP, and IBM. Manufacturers of NetPCs include Compaq (Deskpro 4000n NetPC), Pa ckard Bell NEC (NetPC), and HP (netVectra). NC manufacturers include Sun Microsystems (JavaStation) and IBM (Network Station).


Up to the Cover Story section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: Stop the InsanitySearchSend a comment on this articleSubscribe to BYTE or BYTE on CD-ROM  
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network