Archives
 
 
 
  Special
 
 
 
  About Us
 
 
 

Newsletter
Free E-mail Newsletter from BYTE.com

 
    
           
Visit the home page Browse the four-year online archive Download platform-neutral CPU/FPU benchmarks Find information for advertisers, authors, vendors, subscribers

ArticlesTest Methodology


February 1998 / BYTE Hardware Lab Report / Test Methodology

We measured throughput with two different tests. The MPC benchmark, which NSTL developed for the Multimedia PC Council in conjunction with Intel, measures data throughput for both random and sequential access. It determines how much CPU power disks need, and indicates what impact they will have on the delivery of multimedia content.

A second test, which uses the ThreadMark benchmark software from Adaptec (available at http://www.adaptec.com), is designed to indicate how well a disk subsystem handles periods of high I/O activity. We deem this test important because you're likely to find server applications where the drive handles a large number of requests from many different users. ThreadMark makes a series of measurements using a mixture of single and multithreaded requests across a range of request block sizes (2 KB to 64 KB).

Both the ThreadMark and the MPC benchmarks comprise our performance score, which equals from 65 to 80 percent of a drive's overall rating. Cost-per-gigabyte is another 5 to 20 percent of the overall score. Reliability, which is difficult to test, makes up the remaining 10 to 15 percent of the overall score. (See the article "Hard Drive Ratings".) We rated these hard drives by warranty length and by mean time between failures, or MTBF. (For the IBM drives, we assumed an average MTBF figure; see the print edition of the features table.) MTBF, measured in hours, is a calculated statistical attribut e, determined by combining the MTBF numbers for all the components that make up the unit. A problem with relying on MTBF is that you can test it only with large numbers of identical samples. And even though storage densities are increasing, track widths are decreasing, making alignment, precision manufacturing, and head-motion control more critical than ever. Today's high-capacity drives are more reliable than ever thought possible, with 1 million hours MTBF being a common figure. Note that this is not the same thing as saying that a given drive will run without failing for 1 million hours; this figure actually translates to about a 99.999 percent uptime rate over one calendar year.


Disk Drive Performance

illustration_link (18 Kbytes)


Up to the BYTE Hardware Lab Report section contentsGo to previous article: Go to next article: High-Capacity Disk Drives Features
Flexible C++
Matthew Wilson
My approach to software engineering is far more pragmatic than it is theoretical--and no language better exemplifies this than C++.

more...

BYTE Digest

BYTE Digest editors every month analyze and evaluate the best articles from Information Week, EE Times, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Network Computing, Sys Admin, and dozens of other CMP publications—bringing you critical news and information about wireless communication, computer security, software development, embedded systems, and more!

Find out more

BYTE.com Store

BYTE CD-ROM
NOW, on one CD-ROM, you can instantly access more than 8 years of BYTE.
 
The Best of BYTE Volume 1: Programming Languages
The Best of BYTE
Volume 1: Programming Languages
In this issue of Best of BYTE, we bring together some of the leading programming language designers and implementors...

Copyright © 2005 CMP Media LLC, Privacy Policy, Your California Privacy rights, Terms of Service
Site comments: webmaster@byte.com
SDMG Web Sites: BYTE.com, C/C++ Users Journal, Dr. Dobb's Journal, MSDN Magazine, New Architect, SD Expo, SD Magazine, Sys Admin, The Perl Journal, UnixReview.com, Windows Developer Network